Common Living, which was based in Brooklyn in 2015, was an early pioneer of a brand new enterprise in residential property administration: Quite than leasing out complete items, rooms could be rented out to people. Utilities, WiFi, and cleansing prices could be bundled along with hire—and flats could be totally furnished.
Since then, co-living has ballooned throughout the U.S. and globe, however Widespread Residing’s journey as a trailblazer of the mannequin ended unceremoniously late final month when the company announced it was filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection and liquidating its assets. The agency, which operated a U.S. portfolio of 5,200 items throughout 12 cities, now joins a rising checklist of co-living operators who’ve flamed out, leaving questions in regards to the future viability of the mannequin.
In 2023, Widespread Residing merged with a Berlin-based competitor, Habyt, making a joined entity that operated greater than 30,000 items in additional than a dozen international locations. Luca Bovone, Habyt’s CEO, stated that whereas closing Widespread was unlucky, its liquidation would make Habyt a worthwhile firm.
“This choice, though not what we had hoped for, will make the rest of the Habyt group extra financially agile, with larger capability to speed up development and generate worth,” Bovone told Bisnow, a web site devoted to business actual property information.
1000’s of Widespread’s items are going to be taken over by Outpost Membership, one other large within the mannequin that already operates round 1,500 items throughout 40 buildings in New York Metropolis. Sergii Starostin, the agency’s CEO, instructed Fortune that they had taken over administration of seven properties earlier than the chapter was filed, and that Outpost was focusing on 50% of Widespread’s stock.
Whereas many co-living firms went out of enterprise in the course of the pandemic, Widespread was aggressively increasing its portfolio and elevating funding. It acquired round 5,000 items between 2020 and 2022, and by 2023 it had raised greater than $110 million in venture capital. Nonetheless, in an interview with the New York Times, the corporate’s founder Brad Hargreaves declined to touch upon whether or not Widespread was worthwhile or not.
Outpost Membership’s Starostin stated he believed the huge funding that fueled Widespread might have really contributed to its monetary troubles, as investments drove the corporate to broaden at a fast tempo in markets like Nashville, Ottawa, and Chicago.
“Widespread wanted to develop in lots of locations very quick,” Starostin instructed Fortune, explaining that selecting up a single property in a brand new market requires constructing utterly new workers and advertising operations. “And once you multiply that by 20 … that turns into a reasonably costly journey. My opinion is that to scale this sort of enterprise, it simply takes extra time.”
Habyt CEO Luca Bovone instructed Bloomberg that Widespread’s chapter was associated to the corporate’s contracts and enterprise, in addition to the elevated strain of rates of interest.
This isn’t the primary time Outpost has stepped in to handle a former competitor’s contracts. It took over a few of Bedly’s sublease agreements in Manhattan and New Jersey when the corporate shut down in 2019, and it did the identical when the German firm Quarters declared bankruptcy in 2021.
Like Widespread, Quarters failed regardless of its success in elevating enterprise capital. The Medici Residing Group raised $300 million for its German subsidiary to broaden within the U.S. in 2019.
“Enterprise Capital is just not working very effectively with actual property, as a result of we see calls for to develop in like 10 or 15 totally different markets fairly quickly,” Starostin stated. “So I believe that these firms failed as a result of they had been demanded to develop too quick in many various markets, and that’s very tough to do in actual property.”
Clara Arroyave is the CEO of Co-Residing Cashflow, a platform to purchase, promote, and put money into co-living properties. Whereas she stated she was upset by the information about Widespread earlier this month, she additionally stated it wasn’t shocking contemplating the quantity of funding staked within the firm’s enlargement.
“While you elevate enterprise capital, you’re pressured to develop and to ship in a short time,” stated Arroyave, who based and ran a co-living firm in Boston before it went out of business in the course of the pandemic. “And plenty of occasions you’re pushed to broaden your quantity of rooms or demand or market, and also you continue to grow with out profitability or having a really excessive overhead value.”
In contrast to different outstanding opponents which have flamed out, Starostin instructed Fortune that Outpost has chosen to pay attention their operations — and plans for enlargement — in New York, the place they’ve already established workers and advertising networks.
The pandemic was a critical check for the mannequin, and a few of its largest operators shuttered as many potential tenants veered away from close-quartered dwelling preparations with strangers. When Quarters went down, it operated round 3,000 items and was creating 1,500 extra. 2021 additionally noticed the demise of WeLive, the co-living offshoot of WeWork, and The Collective, a UK-based agency that had nearly 100,000 items in its portfolio when it declared chapter.
Beyond the pandemic, issues with enlargement, and excessive rates of interest, co-living firms need to grapple with issues extra particular to their nonetheless comparatively new method to housing. Many firms promote themselves much less as conventional landlords, and extra as platforms to attach folks with out there rooms. Potential renters don’t have to fret about discovering roommates to go in on a full unit, or a year-long lease. Rooms are rented individually and folks typically keep just some months. However the considerably fluid, hands-off method has led to issues in some cases.
In 2022, the Daily Beast reported that some tenants of Widespread Residing properties had complained to the corporate about safety points, poor upkeep, and occupants dwelling on web site who had been probably harmful. One tenant posted in an condo group chat that he was going to set fireplace to the constructing—however the residents quoted within the article reported that Widespread’s response group failed to speak or deal with conditions in an acceptable or well timed method.
And but regardless of the shutdown of Widespread and different opponents, Co-Residing Cashflow’s Arroyave and Outpost Membership’s Starostin stated they consider the enterprise mannequin is right here to remain. Whereas it has progressed in suits and begins, the pliability and easy accessibility to housing on the core of the co-living thought is one thing that there’s greater than sufficient demand for amongst younger renters.
“Younger folks can not afford hire, and the basics of housing—in New York, in Boston, in LA—the numbers should not going to alter dramatically anytime quickly,” Arroyave stated. “However for coliving to remain sturdy, the query is, what’s the a part of the enterprise mannequin that’s not working?”
“The transfer is already there,” Starostin stated. “I don’t suppose it’ll go anyplace. It’s only a query of who will develop on this market, however the market itself is there.”