![](https://i0.wp.com/hyperallergic-newspack.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2024/07/Norman_2024-3-1200x1800.jpg?resize=780%2C1170&quality=95&ssl=1)
This text is a part of Hyperallergic’s 2024 Pride Month series, that includes interviews with art-world queer and trans elders all through June.
Norman Kleeblatt has been a outstanding curator in New York Metropolis’s museum scene for many years. His exhibitions on the Jewish Museum, the place he began as a curatorial assistant in 1981 and went on to function the establishment’s chief curator from 2005 to 2017, have exercised an vital affect on the sector.
His 1987 exhibition The Dreyfus Affair: Art, Truth and Justice explored the connection between artwork and politics by inspecting visible responses to the scandalous Dreyfus Affair. It even earned him an award from the French authorities. His 1996 exhibition Too Jewish? challenged in style concepts round Jewishness and was an vital contribution to bigger conversations in the course of the period concerning our understanding of multiculturalism. Extra lately his examinations of Summary Expressionism within the 2008 exhibition Action/Abstraction: Pollock, de Kooning, and American Art, 1940–1976 and his 2014 From the Margins: Lee Krasner and Norman Lewis, 1945–1952 each energized our conception of a motion that was foundational to the modern artwork world.
His considerate method comes by in his curating, and he all the time appears to discover a method to prolong conversations in new and fascinating methods, and that’s what I most take pleasure in about him and his work. On this interview, we talk about his life, work, and perception as some of the influential LGBTQ+ curators in New York.
* * *
Hyperallergic: You may have an uncommon and what I’d think about a “very New York” popping out story in that you simply did issues your manner. Do you thoughts sharing your expertise?
Norman Kleeblatt: Although maybe a traditional “New York-specific” twist, I feel relationship on the whole and popping out particularly mirrored the tradition and zeitgeist of the Seventies. My era grew up with the separation — segregation is likely to be a greater time period — of LGBTQ+ from straight society: tons unstated and hidden beneath the cloud of homophobia. The language used on the time would right this moment be thought of microaggressions. Numerous what was instilled by household and straight society appeared pure and secure; on the one hand, that was engaging. On the opposite, different choices can be tough if not harmful.
By the tip of the Seventies, a sizeable variety of my male mates and acquaintances initially had been in relationships with girls; many I knew, like me, had been married. Stonewall in 1969 permitted a brand new angle towards sexuality in each queer and straight communities. A sure libertinism (sexual and in any other case) pervaded the last decade. For the second a part of the last decade, I used to be in a position to have relationships with each ladies and men, generally causally, typically with emotional attachments. I’m not speaking about competing, emotionally fraught homosexual/straight triangles, not like the relations uncovered in such influential movies as Sunday, Bloody Sunday (1971) or the current film Passages (2023). In my case on the time, I had separate relationships, one with a person and one a lady. With the onset of AIDS, and its terrifying, life-threatening dangers, such freedoms and couplings ended abruptly. By 1980, I had begun a long-term relationship with Peter, the one who is now my husband.
H: And you’re Jewish and served because the longtime director of the Jewish Museum, so I’m curious the way you noticed your identities typically interacting within the artwork neighborhood. Did you are feeling a battle or have been you in a position to negotiate that simply? I’m asking significantly as a result of many people are sometimes negotiating related realities with varied communities we really feel part of.
NK: I used to be chief curator on the Jewish Museum from 2005–2017. I started in a part-time curatorial place in 1981 quickly after Joan Rosenbaum was appointed director. A toddler of refugees from Nazi Germany, I grew up in New Jersey, did my undergrad at Rutgers, then graduate work at New York College’s Institute of High-quality Arts. Truthfully this was a second in my life that, as a homosexual man, I felt most alienated, questioning my Jewish identification. What half, if any, did “Jewish” have in both my private life or my skilled profession?
Slowly I, together with {many professional} colleagues, realized that identities have been difficult, typically contradictory. Complexity and contradiction are two ideas which have been central to my private experiences {and professional} practices. For instance, Deborah Kass, who can also be queer and Jewish, and I started an intense dialog about this matter. Others who finally participated in my exhibition Too Jewish?: Difficult Conventional Identities supplied their very own voices/experiences/questions/conundrums. With little preliminary intent or manipulation, a substantial variety of the artists I included occurred to be homosexual: Greg Bordowitz, Cary Leibowitz, Rhonda Lieberman, Sandi DuBowski, and Deb Kass have been amongst them. Humor and irony, even ironic self-deprecation (are these Jewish or homosexual traits/stereotypes?) have been a part of the present’s artists’ modes of self-presentations. These have been mentioned as such by critics who wrote concerning the exhibition.
However as with my extra difficult popping out, my query to myself was whether or not and the way to be an “out Jew.” This might have had direct implications for my curatorial observe, particularly as a curator on the Jewish Museum. I feel that the collision of those two identities added yet one more stage of complexity to my observe. On the time, what did Jewish and/or queer folks must do with artwork, with curating? This was not an insignificant query. I received the job within the Eighties, when multiculturalism and identification politics started to turn out to be a severe a part of the conversations about artwork and advanced into a gaggle of significant museum reveals addressing such points. The 1993 Whitney Biennial was a significant second of multi-dimensional exploration. Distilling that to a broad, gauged “Jewish” angle was the foremost focus of the beforehand talked about 1996 exhibition Too Jewish?. The query mark within the title is reflective of the best way I’ve all the time labored on exhibitions and analysis: All the time start with a query. Preserve asking questions. Supply options, not solutions.
H: I love your curiosity in questioning, which does really feel like it may well perform as a sort of queering, but additionally, as you talked about, be related to different traditions, like your personal Jewish mental heritage. What questions do you want queer folks within the artwork neighborhood would ask extra or examine extra?
NK: I hesitate to categorize or essentialize the traits as both good, unhealthy, or detached of queers, Jews, and so many different partial identities. But after all the thought of questioning is a helpful deal with, no less than for me. What I want to query is how the experiences of queers, Jews, and so many different teams could have led to the behaviors of self-interrogation.
Placing that into my mental, artwork historic, and curatorial strategy advanced however evidently it is also a part of how I feel. Maybe the primary instance of questioning in my curatorial function is the 1987 present I organized, The Dreyfus Affair: Artwork, Fact and Justice. Going by the works on paper within the Jewish Museum’s assortment, I found a gaggle of no less than 30 posters titled Musée des Horreurs (Museum of Horrors). As its eponymous title claimed, the photographs have been ghastly. Horrible just isn’t an sufficient time period to explain them. Zola as a pig; Dreyfus as a snake. But additionally they have been seductive visually — maybe an excessive amount of so.
Nonetheless they supplied the bottom zero for a yearslong holy grail to take a look at the notorious Affair, which rocked French society and worldwide relations reflecting the disparate viewpoints of mental, political, inventive, literary, even filmic manufacturing.
One other instance is when Kenneth Silver and I co-curated the 1998 monographic Chaim Soutine exhibition. Our large query was the place the Lithuanian-born “French expressionist” may match into the artwork historic matrix. We assigned ourselves the complete battery of criticism that had been written concerning the artist from the early Nineteen Twenties to the Eighties. As we sat down collectively to debate and analyze what we learn, we realized that there have been in truth three totally different “Soutines” characterised (dare I say concocted?) within the literature. Questioning how which may come by within the exhibition, we truly ended up creating three totally different galleries, with three totally different architectures for the three totally different Soutine characterizations we uncovered.
Likewise, Motion/Abstraction: Pollock, de Kooning and American Artwork, 1940–1976 originated from the questions of the way to create a special strategy to exhibiting and inspecting this seminal interval of American artwork. Extra particularly: Can one set up an exhibition by the lens of the competing critics Clement Greenberg and Harold Rosenberg?
Then, in 2014, I labored on one other present that got here straight out of Motion/Abstraction. Right here Summary Expressionism was examined by a particular, extremely targeted lens. From the Margins: Lee Krasner and Norman Lewis, 1945–1952 featured two painters who have been traditionally underappreciated. Lee Krasner and Norman Lewis, a lady and an African American, shared a surprisingly related visible language throughout this era. The exhibition checked out ways in which every artist’s strategy joined abstraction with cultural specificity.
H: Are you able to inform us a couple of formative artwork expertise that influences you till at the present time, one thing that continues to tell your work and life?
NK: I imagine formative artwork experiences proceed so long as a person is compos mentis. I imagine that’s why I proceed to look, hear, expertise, and query artwork. I’m talking of artwork within the broadest, most common phrases — together with music, literature, movie, structure, and many others., and many others. In some senses I’m an addict, continually in search of new emotions and methods of expression. Seeing previous and current as a continuum is vital in the best way I strategy artwork and historical past.
An excellent instance for me is a two-part encounter. My first in-person encounter with Matthias Grünewald’s Isenheim Altarpiece in Colmar, in Alsace, France, was pivotal, after all. From the time I first noticed a photograph of that masterpiece, Colmar had been a prime cease on my pilgrimage checklist. My first go to to the Musée Unterlinden was within the mid Eighties, on the peak of the AIDS epidemic. The useless Christ’s pores and skin on the middle panel is contaminated with lesions of the kind that have been the seen results of a illness prevalent on the time Grünewald painted it. Referred to as ergotism, or St. Anthony’s hearth, it was a painful illness that got here from fungal-infected rye flour. [It was] painted as an altarpiece for a monastery/hospital the place equally contaminated sufferers’ beds have been wheeled into the chapel to hope and obtain some type of religious therapeutic from the sight of Christ having suffered related agony. The lesions seemed remarkably just like the Kaposi sarcoma suffered by many AIDS sufferers. Akin to the mortal pores and skin illness of the sixteenth century, the AIDS analogy appeared blatantly evident to me. But the thought of making a way of psychological/religious therapeutic felt alien to how our modern society handled these struggling.
Greater than a decade later an identical visible encounter occurred for me after I first noticed AA Bronson’s billboard-size {photograph} titled “June 5, 1994” (1994/1999) on the opening of the 2002 Whitney Biennial. AA staged his lately deceased sitter — who had been considered one of his companions within the famous artist group Common Concept within the hours shortly after Felix Partz’s demise from AIDS-related causes. Terrifying, it stopped me in my tracks. I targeted, shut down, nearly disregarded the thrill of throngs of different guests.
Versus Grünewald’s useless Christ, [it was] as profound, possibly much more so, by specializing in a selected beloved, modern, recognized particular person who was not an icon of non secular veneration. However Felix too was now a logo and made all us viewers weak — a harrowing reminder of the continued struggling and devastating losses from AIDS. AA felt the “useless stroll amongst us, [the living].”
H: How would you characterize the methods museums have modified through the years and do you assume they’ve turn out to be extra inclusive?
NK: After all, there was motion on this course, with museums being attentive to exhibiting and filling gaps in collections, particularly of artists which have been ignored by Western artwork historical past. Nonetheless, the initiatives appear targeted on one- or two-dimensional traits as if there are “to-include” lists that may merely be ticked off. How do establishments start to open up purviews and discourses to the extra extremely faceted nature and complexity of particular person identities, particularly amongst cultural producers? Inevitably this may take time. Trying again, at one time organizations noticed hope in multiculturalism. Quickly that grew to become mentioned as an unfulfilled promise. Then curators like Okwui Enwezor began opening discourse within the West to broader concepts round globalism. I keep in mind his Documenta in 2000, which helped audiences be aware dialogues and disparities between and amongst its broad-ranging individuals. It conveyed in a way the complexity of every particular person, [that] every artist had quite a few difficult elements
One of many points with museums right this moment is that there’s speak of range, fairness, inclusion (DEI), however nonetheless a lot much less vary amongst higher workers than can be anticipated. After which there’s museum admission, which is typically at or close to $30 per visiting grownup. Not insignificant for a working- or middle-class household of 4, and even one. The acknowledgement of financial and/or class distinction is much less thought of than different elements of the DEI quadrant.
H: Are you able to inform us about queer life in New York in the course of the ’70s and ’80s and the way that’s modified? Do you could have any nostalgia for that older scene?
NK: It’s humorous that we started this interview with our dialogue of a slowly evolving “New York” popping out, and now that I consider it, my very own popping out was gradual, quiet, distinctive to me by comparability.
The late ’70s was a time of nice private and sexual freedom in addition to experimentation, which I skilled at a distance. I solely started to come back out within the very late Seventies, when there was a brand new openness of homosexual life — and as I stated earlier than, sexual permissiveness on the whole. I met folks on the health club, within the grocery retailer, the bus cease, and on the sidewalk. An encounter may start sexually and develop right into a friendship.
A lot as I attempted to keep away from emotional attachment, by 1980 I used to be in a live-in relationship with Peter (now my husband). Collectively we continued and cherished our earlier relationships with straight mates — in truth we nonetheless trusted them for emotional assist. We additionally started to develop a coterie of homosexual mates, largely {couples}, who had come from straight relationships and marriages, and had fairly shortly entered into dedicated relationships with males. After all, the Eighties framed the AIDS disaster as painful, complicated, terrifying.
Discussions amongst homosexual mates pinpointed AIDS. There was so little data, a lot misinformation and confusion on the time. Despair reigned as we listened to information and watched mates undergo and die of AIDS. Generally, we have been in a position to be there for them bodily and psychologically. However I keep in mind one good friend with AIDS within the mid-Eighties shunning former mates, together with me. I felt helpless.
Then after all, most of us noticed ourselves as extremely weak, and infrequently developed false psychosomatic signs. Our straight mates and fogeys have been as upset and as confused as we have been. I can’t say I wax nostalgic, due to the psychological difficulties for me personally and the truth that homophobia exploded in society writ massive. Right now, I do know I stay in a bubble of acceptance for my gayness and recognition of my marriage. However in right this moment’s political setting, that’s as soon as once more threatened.
H: That’s comprehensible, and the distinction between the Seventies and ’80s should’ve been intense. How do you assume that interval impacted the artwork neighborhood and its establishments? When did the primary homosexual or LGBTQ+ exhibitions begin to seem often?
NK: One vital occasion was the start of Day Without Art in December 1989.
I headed planning on the Jewish Museum, and it supplied an vital, significant method to have interaction the AIDS disaster with our skilled organizations and academic missions. The planning introduced workers from many departments along with a objective of providing training and a spot of remembrance, and sure, mourning for household and mates affected by, dwelling with, or misplaced to AIDS. The sense of goal was vital for employees and individuals. Tom Sokolowski [who helped establish the national day of action and mourning] thought of our program probably the most personally affecting considered one of all of the 1989 applications in New York.
As to LGBTQ+ exhibitions, I clearly keep in mind Dan Cameron’s 1982 contribution, Extended Sensibilities: Homosexual Presence in Contemporary Art on the New Museum (when the New Museum was nonetheless housed within the New Faculty on 14th Avenue and Fifth Avenue). It was courageous and provocative, and received fairly a little bit of consideration and even criticism concerning the “formal” elements of the works and “high quality” of the featured artwork. A few of this critique was from the homosexual writers. It was a vastly vital occasion, together with such artists as Scott Burton, Gilbert and George, Jody Pinto, Concord Hammond, and Betty Damon, amongst others. But a lot as I used to be in search of to seek out myself within the exhibition (silly as which may appear), I used to be onerous pressed to narrate to anyone work personally.
H: What would you want to inform youthful LGBTQ+ people who find themselves planning to enter the sector of artwork? Maybe one thing you’d’ve favored to listen to as you began by yourself journey in artwork?
NK: I couldn’t think about giving a youthful LGBTQ+ particular person totally different common recommendation than I’d give to a youthful straight one.
Objectives, which needs to be versatile, must be outlined; willpower and focus are important. I’ve had the pleasure of working with quite a few assistants and interns through the years, plenty of whom I nonetheless think about good mates. Every of their circumstances was particular person when it comes to targets, timetables, monetary conditions, and beginning factors.
For all, get as a lot expertise as doable. Study from the expertise. Turn out to be invaluable to mentors and supervisors. Take heed to conversations of execs at work. Discover the ear of a sympathetic mentor. Turn out to be an professional within the undertaking on which you’re working. Notice that this may require you to assign your self studying homework. I did and to at the present time I’m nonetheless benefiting from this recommendation.
Most vital, discontinue positions that aren’t helpful psychologically. They received’t enable you to professionally. Not least, count on and hope for plenty of good luck.