When the water-logged, bloated corpse of the drowned Maddalena Antognetti, a intercourse employee who used the identify “Lena,” was dredged from Rome’s Tiber river in the summertime of 1604, she was nonetheless lovely. We all know this as a result of her sometimes-lover Michelangelo Merisi, who hustled beneath the identify Caravaggio, used Lena’s useless physique as a mannequin in a masterpiece entitled “Demise of the Virgin.”
Accomplished round 1606 and now on the Louvre, the oil-on-canvas portray transubstantiates Lena right into a red-tunicked Virgin Mary, sprawled in a cruciform place atop a gathering of sheets and pillows whereas an assemblage of apostles mourns round her. A composition resembling “Demise of the Virgin” is a consultant instance of Caravaggio’s brilliance when it got here to the usage of distinction, with the physique of the useless Madonna bathed in an otherworldly gentle that appears to radiate from her being itself, whereas the periphery of the scene is a continuum of sonoluminescence veering from gentle duskiness to the blackness of the void. Mary’s left hand rests on her sternum whereas the lengthy, pale, and chic fingers of her different reaches stiffly towards the viewer as rigor mortis units in. The face of the Madonna — of Lena — is unmistakably of the deceased, for whatever the peacefulness in her closed eyes and expressionless mouth, her brunette hair splayed out behind her, the purplish physique and slack expression convey that that is clearly not an individual asleep. Much more scandalously (at the moment), Caravaggio presents this Mary as bare-footed, her soles smudged with filth. The one indication of divinity within the scene is the skinny crescent of a golden halo above Lena’s — Mary’s — useless face.
A papal legate named Laerzio Cherubini had commissioned this work, wanting an image of Mary’s dying for his chapel within the church of Santa Maria della Scalla. Upon viewing the portray, nonetheless, he rejected it. Not a difficulty of the artist’s private morality, however somewhat of these soiled ft poking out beneath the dying shroud. As Andrew Graham-Dixon writes in Caravaggio: A Life Sacred and Profane (2012), for contemporaries, there was concern that this “indecorous depiction of the Virgin would possibly trigger a stir.” He quotes the artwork collector Giulio Mancini as saying that “somebody educated will reprove us” for displaying the portray, although educated of what, precisely, stays a query. (The mannequin, maybe, as she was identified to solicit exterior of the very church through which her visage hung.) In his concern, Mancini might have additionally been referencing Caravaggio’s notoriety as a drunken reprobate. Giovanni Baglione, a painter, artwork historian, and up to date rival of Caravaggio’s, as an example, wrote in a biography of the painter that he was wont to look “for an opportunity to interrupt his neck or jeopardize the lifetime of one other.” A person who was keen on courtesans and adolescent boys alike, charged with crimes as (comparatively) middling as serenading his landlady with obscene songs (accompanied by guitar) and smearing excrement on her door, and flinging artichokes within the face of a waiter as a result of he couldn’t reply in the event that they have been cooked in butter or olive oil, to sins as heinous as mutilating the genitals of a person he killed in a gang combat.
If anybody is a consultant case of critic Claire Dederer’s query in Monsters: A Fan’s Dilemma (2023) of “what ought we do about nice artwork made by unhealthy males,” it’s Caravaggio. As a result of Caravaggio actually wasn’t a great man — he was a hustler and legal, an addict and assassin. Cherubini knew that; everybody in Rome knew that. However he was a painter of startling originality and brilliance as effectively, who might coax gentle from darkness in such distinction that it was as if the God of Genesis dividing the day from the evening. When Cherubini appeared upon Lena, he solely noticed a prostitute, however when Caravaggio represented her, she was the very Mom of God.
Each aesthetically and theologically, Caravaggio is a painter of immanence: The deep distinction of his chiaroscuro means that sparks of divinity glow even from inside the blackest confines. An artist who, to reappropriate John Milton’s phrase in Paradise Misplaced (1667), penned almost six a long time later, made “darkness seen.” A consummate painter of the Catholic Counter-Reformation, even when — perhaps particularly if — the work he produced is scandalous. The place northern-European Protestants have been participating in a Kulturkampf of iconoclastic fury, smashing statues and stained-glass home windows, white-washing frescoes and mosaics, the French, Spanish, and Italian Catholics somewhat inspired an orgy of maximalism as a rejoinder. Bernini, El Greco, Valázquez — all have been sectarians of this new fashion that emphasised overabundance, however Caravaggio was maybe probably the most astute, not simply in ability however in philosophical imaginative and prescient. Referring to the Catholic doctrine that sure rituals sign the divine’s incarnation on the planet, notably in the course of the Eucharist, when wafer and wine flip into the physique and blood of Christ, Regina Mara Schwartz writes in Sacramental Poetics at the Dawn of Secularism: When God Left the World (2008) that sacraments have been miracles “so not often achieved, of mixing with the opposite: thoughts, soul, and physique.” Acceptable, then, contemplating the divine violence of Caravaggio’s physique of labor, that sacrament and sacrifice share a Latin etymological root, each associated to the phrase for sacred.
In Catholic nations, the place the transformation of the wafer and wine was nonetheless thought to be actual, an artist like Caravaggio might specific that sense of holiness — of the union of thoughts, soul, and physique — in his compositions, a imaginative and prescient of a “paradisal Eucharist and a transubstantiating universe,” as Schwartz writes. The outcome, in Caravaggio’s case, is a particular fashion, a technique and a signifies that drew upon and depicted sacramentality as thrumming by our fallen actuality, whereby nothing is as excellent as a pantheist would possibly hope or as corrupted as a Calvinist believes, however somewhat the place the sacred is studded within the profane like diamonds in a vein of coal. Mining for holiness in our corrupted world was a specific genius for the painter, who discovered religion and ecstasy in violence and intercourse. “Like Sophocles or Samuel Beckett or Toni Morrison,” writes Teju Cole in the New York Times, “Caravaggio is an artist who goes there with us, to the painful locations of actuality. And once we are there with him, we sense that he’s no mere information. We notice that he’s the truth is at house in that ache, that he lives there.”
Scripture is arguably an account of how holiness is studded all through the ache of this world, and Caravaggio was a grasp artist of such biblical topics. Look at the central determine in his “The Crowning with Thorns,” painted round 1602–04 and held by the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna: Christ centered within the decrease half of the portray, stubbled face downcast, a putting vermillion cloak barely masking his nudity, a centurion in Sixteenth-century armor watching as two servants lean down, having simply pressed the gnarled crown onto the messiah’s brow. There’s nearly no background, merely a shaft of sunshine rising from the higher left permeating this scene in each lustry radiance and tenebrous darkness. These figures, who’re very a lot from a time and place, are, beneath Caravaggio’s hand, suspended in an eternity of no time or place. The straining muscle groups on the servants, the rippling of fats above Christ’s waist as he’s compelled to crouch down, the sheen on the armor of the centurion — all of it a verisimilitude engendered by contrasts of shadow and glow so vibrant that the result’s virtually past actual, a veritable transrealism. Because the alchemists might management the weather and necromancers the porous line between the dwelling and the useless, so too was Caravaggio proficient within the theurgy of sunshine and darkish.
For Caravaggio is the unassailably undisputed grasp of chiaroscuro. The painter’s very identify has come to be all however synonymous with that attribute contrasting of darkish and lightweight — even neophytes can simply establish Caravaggio’s work. What Caravaggio presents by way of that method is a sort of religiosity that transcends its topics — a sophisticated, painful, and disturbing religiosity that’s all of the extra sacred due to it. When the Council of Trent met within the years between 1545 and 1563, they outlined a sacrament as a factor “subjected to the senses, which has the facility not solely of signifying but additionally of effecting grace.” By that criterion broadly deployed, Caravaggio’s artwork is sacramental — the work of a demon who might paint as an angel, translating sin into inspiration. Because it have been, it’s exactly that combination of the demonic and the angelic, the Dionysian and the Apollonian, that made such transformations doable.
If that Italian time period regards the interdependence of sunshine with darkish, the methods through which that means can solely be comprehended by espying the 2 ever in distinction, then chiaroscuro will be deployed for Caravaggio in a biographical sense as effectively. These tough, calloused, cuticle-split fingers stained with pink and black oil have been additionally fingers that grasped a rapier because it fatally slashed the femoral artery of an area gangster and pimp named Ranuccio Tomassoni. The 2 dueled not over Lena, however one other intercourse employee named Fillide Melandroni, a slight strawberry blonde who’d modeled for Caravaggio quite a few instances, most notably in his “Judith Beheading Holofernes,” made round 1599 and now held on the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Antica in Rome. In that portray, Judith’s delicate, ivory-colored hand grasps at a tangle of her sufferer’s matted, greasy hair whereas the sword bisects Holoferne’s screaming trachea within the second earlier than a swift flip would full the decapitation. A sprig of crimson, pink because the backdropped curtain, stains the mattress’s luxurious white sheets. The mannequin for Holofernes was Caravaggio himself.
The hand that slew Tomassoni was the identical hand that completed “Demise of the Virgin” — and in the identical yr of 1606. Violence was a muse for Caravaggio, and if life was already low-cost in Renaissance Italy, among the many madding crowd of Rome’s underclass, through which the artist should be included, the costs have been slashed even decrease. An obsession with violence — notably of the detaching-a-head-from-the-shoulders selection — permeates Caravaggio’s oeuvre. For a Christian artist, the Bible — a heinously violent e-book, it ought to be remembered — afforded ample alternatives in each the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testomony to depict tortures, immolations, crucifixions, and decapitations. Holofernes, as an example, is joined by the Outdated Testomony Isaac and the New Testomony John the Baptist in Caravaggio’s obsession with shedding one’s head. In his 1603 “The Sacrifice of Isaac,” held by the Uffizi, the artist captures the second through which the angel of the Lord stills the hand of Abraham as he holds a knife to the throat of his younger son, the patriarch’s baby wanting up in horror, not but conscious of his salvation. Decapitation can also be the topic of the 1610 “David with the Head of Goliath,” now on the Galleria Borghese, through which the Jewish king is rendered as a barely postpubescent man bathed in gentle, holding the top of the slain large by his tangled hair, his dim, useless eyes nonetheless open in boring shock, the mouth of the Philistine warrior slack-jawed, every jagged tooth a grim yellow shovel. The mannequin for Goliath, perhaps unsurprisingly, was once more Caravaggio himself.
Not that the Hebraic want be the one supply of violent imagery. The Hellenic was simply as blood-soaked: Turning from Jerusalem to Athens, the painter pursued his fascination with decapitation together with his arresting 1597 “Medusa,” additionally on the Uffizi. The gorgon’s head lays in a inexperienced circle, as if on the platter by which the Baptist’s head was introduced to Salome, her eyes as shocked as have been Goliath’s, her mouth open in rage, the tangle of snakes that compose her hair showing as in the event that they have been nonetheless writhing, a cascade of blood trailing from her severed neck. Stunned as Goliath, sure, however seemingly nonetheless defiant regardless of her dying — Caravaggio’s Medusa shares extra of the female rage of Judith than the abject defeat of Holofernes.
There’s all the time a danger in imparting a recent political sensibility onto an artist like Caravaggio, whose life is so alien to us. But the choice to render himself because the monster to be slayed — by biblical lady related to willpower and energy, no much less — can’t be incidental both. The artist actually had precedent to attract from in scripture, Baroque aesthetics, and Catholic theology. However within the aesthetic choices he made, we will learn a want to absolve himself of some guilt by imagining, and portraying, his personal violent homicide again and again. A masochist, maybe, however a theological one, who understood that every one fallen beings — together with himself — are made within the picture of not simply the demons, but additionally of God.
Frances Larson notes in Severed: A History of Heads Lost and Heads Found (2015) that Caravaggio was “drawn to the human physique in extremis,” an artist who “appreciated to sentence his half-headless topics to hold endlessly in that excruciating second between life and dying.” Possibly it’s extra all-encompassing to say that Caravaggio was obsessive about bodily in extremis not simply by way of what’s excruciating, however with its antonym of ecstasy, which nonetheless mirrors the previous in depth.
An unmistakably erotic painter — all of these lovely courtesans modeling as biblical characters and bare-chested boys, resembling his David or the puckish, bare, winged cupid within the 1602 “Amor Vincit Omnia,” held on the Gemäldegalerie in Berlin. Telling how Larson describes the “second between life and dying,” for if Caravaggio is the renderer of that which is excruciating but additionally that which is ecstatic, then dying and the orgasmic should by necessity be paired in that unusual mystic theophany, that second shedding of oneself. Such is the purview of religion, for Caravaggio’s most erotic photos are these intimately tied not simply to scriptural narrative, however to the expertise of God. His 1595 “Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy,” held at Hartford’s Wadsworth Athenaeum, depicts the monk in revelry, the supernatural actually rendered within the type of an angel who cradles the saint — albeit as a ravishing adolescent boy with wings. Way more outstanding, then, is “Mary Magdalene in Ecstasy,” painted in 1606 and now held in non-public assortment, which seems to as soon as once more use Lena as mannequin. Right here, somewhat than presenting his favored intercourse employee because the Virgin, he presents her as, effectively, a intercourse employee. Fingers clasped over a white tunic and pink gown, clothes not dissimilar to what she wears in “Demise of the Virgin,” the still-corpuscular Lena leans again with pale shoulder uncovered, hair hanging straight down, eyes closed and mouth open, a illustration of ecstasy that appears much less of the paranormal selection and extra of the unrepentantly sexual — although, after all, because the painter maybe suggests, these aren’t so divergent.
There is no such thing as a angel right here cradling Magdalene. Her pleasure is that if not carnal, then earthly, however no much less sacred due to it. St. Teresa of Avila, certainly, wrote in her autobiography of 1565 that she skilled divinity as a “thrusting… at instances into my coronary heart piercing my very entrails… it made me moan….” Ache and pleasure blended collectively, together with good and evil — the chiaroscuro of the soul. The query of how we perceive nice artwork created by unhealthy folks isn’t commensurate with Caravaggio’s pained ecstasies, for a part of the miracle of his complete corpus is that such work might come from a hand that murdered, so {that a} fallen angel continues to be an angel in spite of everything. What will we do with such work? We’re moved by it, seduced by it, enlightened by it, entranced by it, saved by it. Like Caravaggio himself, we should discover the profane in paradise and the divine within the dross — a lesson true whether or not in his biography or his work. In such gardens, even useless timber can develop the sweetest of fruit.